Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: This is a test Test Let it be

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #7
    Junior Member tenda's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    3
    Rep Power
    0
    Cool testing, table tag is working , BTW its default vbulletin feature


    Function Code for getting Column Letter from Column Number
    Shortened version used in Post #14
    http://www.excelfox.com/forum/showth...=9837#post9837
    Public Function CL(ByVal lclm As Long) As String

    And Fuller version with explaining 'Comments


    Code:
    Public Function CL(ByVal lclm As Long) As String '         http://www.excelforum.com/development-testing-forum/1101544-thread-post-appendix-no-reply-needed-please-do-not-delete-thanks-4.html#post4213980
        Do: Let CL = Chr(65 + (((lclm - 1) Mod 26))) & CL: Let lclm = (lclm - (1)) \ 26: Loop While lclm > 0
    End Function
    
    Function FukOutChrWithDoWhile(ByVal lclm As Long) As String 'Using chr function and Do while loop      For example http://www.excelforum.com/excel-programming-vba-macros/796472-how-to-go-from-column-number-to-column-letter.html
    Dim rest As Long 'Variable for what is "left over" after subtracting as many full 26's as possible
        Do
        '    Let rest = ((lclm - 1) Mod 26) 'Gives 0 to 25 for Column Number "Left over" 1 to 26. Better than ( lclm Mod 26 ) which gives 1 to 25 for clm 1 to 25 then 0 for 26
        '    Let FukOutChrWithDoWhile = Chr(65 + rest) & FukOutChrWithDoWhile 'Convert rest to Chr Number, initially with full number so the "units" (0-25), then number of 26's left over (if the number was so big to give any amount of 26's in it, then number of 26's in the 26's left over (if the number was so big to give any amount of 26 x 26's in it, Enit ?
        '    'OR
        Let FukOutChrWithDoWhile = Chr(65 + (((lclm - 1) Mod 26))) & FukOutChrWithDoWhile
        Let lclm = (lclm - (1)) \ 26 'This gives the number of 26's ( if any ), but just the excact part, in the next number down , - so applying the rest formula to this new number will again leave a difference "left over" rest.
        'lclm = (lclm - (rest + 1)) \ 26 ' As the number is effectively truncated here, any number from 1 to (rest +1)  will do in the formula
        Loop While lclm > 0 'Only loop further if number was big enough to still have 0-25's in it
    End Function
    Rem Ref    http://www.excelforum.com/development-testing-forum/1101544-thread-post-appendix-no-reply-needed-please-do-not-delete-thanks-4.html#post4213980
    Rem Ref    http://www.excelforum.com/tips-and-tutorials/1108643-vba-column-letter-from-column-number-explained.html



    Let it be
    2 reasons really:
    _1) I am not sure if I have it right, I may not be using exactly the correct terminology, but my thinking is that you can broadly/ approximately speaking do three things to/with stuff/things in VB
    _1(i) You assign an object , which VB knows to do if you use Set
    _1(ii) You assign a value , which VB knows to do if you use Let
    _1(iii) You use a Method/Property/Function of something , which VB knows to do if you don't use anything
    But because VB is good at guessing/ distinguishing between (ii) and (iii) you can leave it out in cases (ii), and VB will use Let "internally" for you as the implicit default in whatever compile thingy it does/has.
    I prefer not to use implicit defaults.

    _2) Aesthetics.
    My coding distinguishes itself, I feel, from others, in its beauty. My coding is beautiful. Those extra pretty blue Lets further add to its beauty, IMHO


    http://www.eileenslounge.com/viewtop...271519#p271519




    Another reason is it helps to distinguish the two Public Property procedures in Class things , ( The Let and Get stuff )
    Simplified example: I have a Class module called Car, and I have a color property of it , CrColor

    The relevant bit of my simplified Class Module is this
    Private PrvteCrColor As String
    Public Property Let CrColor(Clr As String)
    Let PrvteCrColor = Clr
    End Property


    In a simple use within a normal code module I would use something of this form
    Dim objCr As Car: Set objCr = New Car
    __ objCr.CrColor = "Yellow"


    That last code line is what effectively uses the Public Property Let . But I can write it as
    Let objCr.CrColor = "Yellow"

    So that’s quite helpful to the novice to help not get the Public Property Let and Get mixed up




    https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnxwq2aGJRbjOo_MO54oaHA
    Last edited by DocAElstein; 06-12-2023 at 05:42 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. Testing Image Links
    By DocAElstein in forum Test Area
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-19-2022, 01:57 PM
  2. Test
    By DocAElstein in forum Test Area
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-30-2020, 07:20 PM
  3. test
    By EFmanagement in forum Test Area
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-29-2019, 11:01 PM
  4. Test
    By Excel Fox in forum Word Help
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-05-2011, 01:51 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •