Test Whether A Point Is In A Polygon Or Not

[Rick Rothstein]

Hi Rick,

first thanks for sharing your code, it has been very useful to me. Similar to theCloud, i work with aircraft center of gravity and needed a function similar to yours. However I had some problems:
1- when a point was on a vertical boundarie
2- when a point was on an horizontal boundarie
3- when comparing two Double variable (b = Ycoord)...so I replace Double by Single and it works for now...I might need to use Double in the future, we'll see how it goes

For point numbers 1 and 2, I would refer you to my Note #3. You should not be overly fixated on points lying on the boundary of your polygon. Too many things can affect whether a point actually lies on the boundary. VB's floating point math is not infinite in scale, so the numbers have a limited precision (15 decimal places) and each number in a calculation theoretically degrades the accuracy of the calculated number to the point that you can never be sure if the calculated coordinate really lies on the boundary or not. For example, let's assume point is actually on the boundary... what is the significance if that is considered inside or outside the polygon on a practical level. Given that a theoretical boundary line for a polygon has zero thickness, then if the point was a millionth, trillions, zillions or whatever further away, it would be considered outside the polygon... similarly, if the point were as millionth, trillions, zillions or whatever closer in, it would be considered inside the polygon. At a practical level, either of those points (the further out one or the closer in one) could be considered the same point (what is the practical significance of two points that are a trillions of a inch, millimeter or whatever units of measurement?) So whether a real boundary point calculates inside or outside of the polygon should have absolutely no real world significance at all.

As for changing Doubles to Singles... I would not do that as it lessens the accuracy of all calculations that take place in the routine increasing the chance that a point in the vicinity of the boundary, but not truly "next to" or "on" it might calculate to the wrong side. Rather than making Doubles into Singles, leave them as Doubles and when comparing them, round each of the values down to the same number of decimal place (you choose the number of decimal places that is significant to you) and then compare those rounded down values instead.

]